camera help

[TomK]

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/734894-REG/Pentax_14636_K_r_Digital_SLR_Camera.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/753766-REG/Canon_5757B002_EOS_Rebel_T3_Digital.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/613613-REG/Canon_3818B002_EOS_Rebel_T1i_500D.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/730210-REG/Nikon_25472_D3100_Digital_SLR_Camera.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/734474-REF/Nikon_D5000_Digital_SLR_Camera.html

these are all under a grand and all do at least 720p hd.

I said good, none of those cameras have good audio, battery life, or lenses. You are easily gonna be throwing another $400 in if you want it to be a good setup, if not more.

 

[Bear Grylls]

Dont get a nikon for video, get a canon.

 

[The Batman]

Dont get a nikon for video, get a canon.

DSLRs are a no no friendo.

 

[Ben Moak]

not one of the ones i posted but if you dont think dslr's do good video http://www.vimeo.com/17439665

and tom a used lense for that pentax really isnt that expensive, also it doesnt sound like this guy wants to get to into it anyway

 

[Zach!]

sorry brock but i hated the video i saw from that, just like i dont really get why everyone creams themselves over vx's, especially 1k's, its like ya there great in lowlight and the colors are nice but all the vids i see done with a 1k are all pixelated and kinda choppy. also, GET BACK TO YOUR ARTWORRRRRK, you totally left us on a cliffhanger

vx1k are horrible in low light and everyone loves them cause the colors are nice, the audio is amazing, and you have great Fisheye options for them

 

[Ben Moak]

? i always heard they were awesome in low light

 

[Zach!]

no there horrible haha you might be thinkin about the vx2100 there better in lowlight