This is utterly astounding: But yes, the headtube does resemble the mgp neck due to the arched stance, much more so than the sacrifice deck. But if you want to get really technical with it I'll run a break down for ya...
The head tube resembles the VertX Arx more than anything. Actually, it would appear to be an Arx with a midsection cut out, it is also stationary (welded I presume). You ride for them; I am quite astounded you failed to notice this, or were reluctant to compair your sponsor's deck to this metal pile of shit. The sacrifice headtube doesn't exactly "resemble" it by any definition I am aware of other than if my eyes are squinted like hell. Also because you lack the literary skills to deduce I was simply compairing the headtubes when referencing mpg, I include this sentence to help you better your reading abilities.
Structurally it is not the same to the sacrifice, but heavily similar. Although, again, the back drop outs have a noticible angular difference, but the same general shape. They also somewhat appear to be cut like an addict (rounded & gradual grade of linear deviation). The front is identical to both the sacrifice and mgp decks (other than the edges being rounde off more abrubtly), as well as others.
So to conclude: from a design and structural standpoint, the neck can be more easily compared to both MGP and VertX due to its shape, apparant angle, and foot room. The deck resembles both an addict and sacrifice in its dropouts, and a sacrifice for the deck platform and front (but could be referenced with other decks on the market). Although if the deck cut outs are what make it appear sacrificial,
I could go so far as to say its looks like a TSI.
