obama being pro gay
- Thread starter alexallupinthis
- Start date
humpurple kushiones
Steel Member
why do you believe this?
Dustin Nooner
Super queer.
HAHAHAHAH I was thinking the same thing!
Shut up.
Exactly.
In the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson said "All men are created equal." This is not equality.
if the gay people are doing what they're doing already, it will only make those people more satisfied with the government and thats what counts. if everyone else is going to riot over it, then shame on them. the gays aren't doing any physical or real emotional harm to the rest of the world. there is nothing wrong with being gay
Richey Muniz
Member
gays should be able to have the same rights as anyone else. we love lesbians, whats wrong with gays being gay? they have rights just like someone said. i cant remember there name lol. and we are over populated by faaaaaaaar. this will only help. like someone else i cant remember their name said lol.
tylerbillman
Steel Member
but it's MY RIGHT to force my beliefs upon others and to discriminate against them!!!!!!!!
It's found in a very small percent of all species on Earth so that bit could still be considered a mutation/malfunction.
Until there's scientific evidence in regards to what is considered "normal" sexual attraction, I really don't see a need in arguing this.
As for Obama.. it's whatever man
Bennett_J
Steel Member
Actually, (excuse my lack of sources, I'm on my phone) bats, dolphins, almost every species of whale, many species of primates, and quite a few more, have ALL been found to have homosexuality in their nature. How this comes about is unknown to all, but as more research is done, more species are found to actively participate in "gay" activites.
In reality it is a valid point for arguement, the only flaws are the people who will refute the studies, or claim that the researchers made significant errors. Obviously they have not read a true biological journal, the work is rarely flawed as bio is a subject that takes time but gives clear answers.
Manzie
Steel Member
Pathetic. If I were to ask you why you hate gays what would your answer be? And I don't want any bullshit about them not contributing to the human race. Give a detailed, supported argument and then we'll see how far your opinion goes. There is no justifiable reason to deny gay marriage, or deny gays rights other than pure hate. You live in the United States for fuck sake. Your own constitution guarantees rights to all men, gay or straight. Whenever I see little kids say shit like this it makes me sick.
paulleparik
Steel Member
Why are you guys being gay about the gays being gay? All you guys are doing is hating for what seems like no good reason. Ohh we shouldn't have gays in our community they are different and oooh put them all on an island. Stop being ignorant about others who are normal. Let them love who they want to love and get off their fucking backs about it. Stop being a nazi. And give good reasons why they shouldn't be on earth, besides about the population. Why is this an argument? People are dying of starvation, people don't have homes, other countries are still in need of help from us from natural disasters and your arguing over peoples sexuality.... You make me sick.
humpurple kushiones
Steel Member
im going to say this right now, no matter what excuse any of you little bigots give, it's still bigotry. thats right, no matter what excuse you have for hating gay people, you still hate a group of people and want to deny their rights, and you are still a bigot. i dont care if your dumb little holy book says gay people shouldnt be allowed to be gay, if that's the case tell your god to stop making them.
i dont think bigots should have rights. i think people like matr shouldnt be allowed to vote, drive, get married, or eat and drink anything that hasnt been regurgitated.
i dont think bigots should have rights. i think people like matr shouldnt be allowed to vote, drive, get married, or eat and drink anything that hasnt been regurgitated.
Aaron
Silver Member
We have a winner.
The First Amendment of the Constitution states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Denying gay rights would be pro-Christianity/Catholicism. Therefore, denying those people their right to marriage is in violation of the first amendment.
alexallupinthis
Steel Member
also, someone mentioned whether or not it is a choice. who the fuck cares! it doesnt matter anyway! if it was a decision it wouldnt have mattered anyway. they only add to the community giving us fashionable clothes and theater.
michaelchavez
Steel Member
to both of these, please explain to me how we remotely have an over population problem?
this is a population density map of the usa. as you can hopefully see, the only areas that may be 'over-populated' are along the west coast, and northeastern coast. in the whole middle portion of the usa, theres usually only a couple houses here and there if youre driving across, its not overpopulated, just the population distribution isnt even. the average population density in the USA is 80 people per square mile. only 80. in the northeastern megatropolis (the stretch of populated land from washington dc to boston) there are about 931 inhabitants per square mile, and thats only that section, so that means in other places around the us, there are alot less than 80 people/square mile. this country is not over populated
judging by the graph, look at all that white area, thats about 5 people per square mile in about 1/3 to 1/2 (more or less) of the world. how is that over populated. like i said above, we arent over populated, just the distribution of people across the world is not even.
sorry for offtopicness
michaelchavez
Steel Member
thats a whole different problem, it depends what you mean by over population, if you mean the ratio of people to land, people to food, people to jobs, etc but i guess youre right
humpurple kushiones
Steel Member
overpopulation has nothing to do with land mass. it's about resources and economical variables. we are very very overpopulated.
Bennett_J
Steel Member
to both of these, please explain to me how we remotely have an over population problem?
this is a population density map of the usa. as you can hopefully see, the only areas that may be 'over-populated' are along the west coast, and northeastern coast. in the whole middle portion of the usa, theres usually only a couple houses here and there if youre driving across, its not overpopulated, just the population distribution isnt even. the average population density in the USA is 80 people per square mile. only 80. in the northeastern megatropolis (the stretch of populated land from washington dc to boston) there are about 931 inhabitants per square mile, and thats only that section, so that means in other places around the us, there are alot less than 80 people/square mile. this country is not over populated
judging by the graph, look at all that white area, thats about 5 people per square mile in about 1/3 to 1/2 (more or less) of the world. how is that over populated. like i said above, we arent over populated, just the distribution of people across the world is not even.
sorry for offtopicness
Take a look.
Overpopulation has little to do with homosexuals. The main solution would be breeding limitations of one or two children per married couple (or whatever sorts of civil union), and cheap and legal abortions with government funded contraceptive programs for teen mothers.
That being said, marriage is not about sex, it's about love. A gay couple loves each other as much or more so than a traditional couple. It's perfectly okay, and if you think otherwise I am extremely sorry for your lack of understanding and sympathy.
That being said, marriage is not about sex, it's about love. A gay couple loves each other as much or more so than a traditional couple. It's perfectly okay, and if you think otherwise I am extremely sorry for your lack of understanding and sympathy.