yaaaaaaabuddy
I got myself banned.
but i guarantee alot of people on here like form over function. But i myself think the neck is sweet
alex, i love the way you shut all these people down. people need to stop talking down on this deck
I usually don't like nitpicking at flaws in arguments, but I think there is something to be said. First of all, all the extra engraving and such are in places where the cnc bit will already have already cut from, so those don't add to the price. And besides, if there truly were some cuts from the headtube could be simplified or tweaked, they would make an insignificant difference in the final price, if any at all. Its a huge piece of billet aluminum that gets a long time in a very expensive mill at some machine shop. No matter which way you slice it, its pricey. Any change to the headtube in hopes to lowering cost will also generally sacrifice strength or weight or both. Secondly, once you've purchased the deck/headtube, you'll only be replacing the deck from then on (headtube breaks, its replaced free). If you break this deck, then you will most certainly be breaking phoenixs, districts, tsis, etc., all of which are more expensive than simply replacing the proto deck. Switching out the decks by loosening 3 bolts and a back axle ain't that bad either. I don't plan on buying one, at least for awhile, but I thought I'd add my two cents.I want this deck, but proto needs to make a cheaper headtube. I mean the deck itself must be super cheap, but the headtube it was over done. Cut out the excess machining and engraving and sell this deck way cheaper.
I usually don't like nitpicking at flaws in arguments, but I think there is something to be said. First of all, all the extra engraving and such are in places where the cnc bit will already have already cut from, so those don't add to the price. And besides, if there truly were some cuts from the headtube could be simplified or tweaked, they would make an insignificant difference in the final price, if any at all. Its a huge piece of billet aluminum that gets a long time in a very expensive mill at some machine shop. No matter which way you slice it, its pricey. Any change to the headtube in hopes to lowering cost will also generally sacrifice strength or weight or both. Secondly, once you've purchased the deck/headtube, you'll only be replacing the deck from then on (headtube breaks, its replaced free). If you break this deck, then you will most certainly be breaking phoenixs, districts, tsis, etc., all of which are more expensive than simply replacing the proto deck. Switching out the decks by loosening 3 bolts and a back axle ain't that bad either. I don't plan on buying one, at least for awhile, but I thought I'd add my two cents.
As many people keep saying, it is not overpriced. The deck is relatively expensive to produce so it is relatively expensive to sell. We are not making a cheap deck and selling it for $250.ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohh,SHUT DOWN! Seriously,I have nothing against Proto but,this deck is definitely over priced and to me would have hardly any structural benefits over a Lucky.
We are looking into cutting down the cost of the headtube but to significantly do so it takes a good amount of money on our part. Once it is cheaper you will definitely notice. And don't quote me on the $70/180 break, it may not be that extreme, but the headtube is certainly more expensive than the deck.i think i saw alex saying the deck costs 70 but the headtube cost 180. maybe make a cheaper alternative headtube?
this deck won't snap even if you dropped your mom on it.
Andrew already gave TSI the option to do so, but they did not go with it. So your point is already invalid, sorry.i had a thought, and i kinda went back on it in a couple ways, but lets say you buy just the deck. mount any brake whatever.
now, you have this beautifully wide deck, and no ht! so you look at the options and it just so happens a competing company of my interest (district) makes a head tube for the deck, so you can have the style you like. why couldnt that happen?
and then i remember that proto has a HUGE pet peeve with anything NOT made by them (HIC) and I thought, so if they cant play well with others THAT way, why would andrew DARE let another company in and make something for his deck?
a few debates like that have flown through my mind. just curious on the outcome