Pete Pachota said:Maybe it's just me not being keen enough on the atheists' claims but I don't see what does this article refute. It's pretty obvious that the human perception is limited and there's no way we can learn the whole truth about the reality (although we're not limited only to the 5 senses as Kant states, we also have the reason which allows us to make assumptions and theories, prove them or expand our perception using technology).
it's kind of a circular argument. atheists are always saying "prove to me there's a god and i'll believe it, until then i won't". the article is basically saying there are some things that can't be proven since they are simply beyond what our mind can comprehend, so the atheist argument of "prove it" is invalid.
but either way, in 50 years computers will be smarter than people and then we can just have them figure it out for us.