companies that Jack (copy) parts.

CodyParker

Steel Member
Why are people arguing over lucky copying the pry bars...there are like 30 different companies that made T-bars. So is every company copying each other? Most of them are all called "T-Bars" too.

Inward
zoom-bar-ora.jpg


Lucky
images


Razor
razor_black_bars_m.jpg


HardLine
tbars.jpg


ProRide
index.php


And many more...
 
Why are people arguing over lucky copying the pry bars...there are like 30 different companies that made T-bars. So is every company copying each other? Most of them are all called "T-Bars" too.

Inward
zoom-bar-ora.jpg
woah..sorry off topic but these bars look hella bent lol
 

R-Dubya

Steel Member
T bars are the most common part in the scooter world, i dont even think that counts

It doesn't make sense to say that at all. T bars are only the most common part in the scooter world because every company copies the design...
 

Ben Moak

Steel Member
It doesn't make sense to say that at all. T bars are only the most common part in the scooter world because every company copies the design...

because its the most basic, its square one for all companies, technically the first razor bars even the ones that were raisable were technically t bars.
 

Derek Seay

Member
All you kids arguing can easily agree on one thing:

Lucky copied RAD's crowbars.

Lucky told me at Exposed tour:
"We wanted to make crow look a likes, but we want to make them more accesible. R.A.D never put's out enough inventory, to keep the distributers stocked. So we made some Like Crows for people to buy if Crows go out of Stock."
 

humpurple kushiones

Steel Member
t bars are the staple design, its 2 pipes welded together. its the simple standard, once you start getting into more complicated and original ideas, then copies become an issue.

like if a company made a 2.4 liter 4 cyl engine, its standard, so it wont matter. but then if a company makes a 2.4 liter 4 cyl engine that relies on variable valve timing to increase performance and fuel efficiency and calls it wtec (that's the idea behind vtec for people who dont know), then it's a lot bigger deal.
 

Ben Moak

Steel Member
he worded that wrong. t bars are the staple design, its 2 pipes welded together. its the simple standard, once you start getting into more complicated and original ideas, then copies become an issue.

like if a company made a 2.4 liter 4 cyl engine, its standard, so it wont matter. but then if a company makes a 2.4 liter 4 cyl engine that relies on variable valve timing to increase performance and fuel efficiency and calls it wtec (that's the idea behind vtec for people who dont know), then it's a lot bigger deal.

lol thats exactly what im tryin to get across.
 
K

Kieran Mayhew

Guest
t bars are the staple design, its 2 pipes welded together. its the simple standard, once you start getting into more complicated and original ideas, then copies become an issue.

like if a company made a 2.4 liter 4 cyl engine, its standard, so it wont matter. but then if a company makes a 2.4 liter 4 cyl engine that relies on variable valve timing to increase performance and fuel efficiency and calls it wtec (that's the idea behind vtec for people who dont know), then it's a lot bigger deal.
I agree with this totally, but in some cases copying is actually understandable. Let me use the example of Blunt. Their Mr Smith bars are almost complete copies of Lucky NW bars, however, they are Brendon Smith's signature bars, which means that he obviously liked the design, and figured that if they were his signature bar, Blunt could make some for him when he needed them. It would also make that design more accessible in the AUS.
 

Spicy McHaggis

Steel Member
and dude talking about cars. Nissan was the first car company to invent variable valve timing but they didn't call it vtec it was something else but honda perfected it so much better
 
Top