bumping this thread up, i got my friend to read the blog on AIM. I'll edit the post with some replies in a minute but the first couple things he said were :
friend: wow
friend: looney
friend: lol this guy says hes being brief...
friend: this is so he doesnt actually have to explain anything that might be contradictory to his pathetic case
---- off topic stuff ---
friend: this guy does not know his history...
friend: in the Supreme court case Schenck V. United states... it was ruled that our civil rights are not absolute... especially during times of war, which is what we are in
friend: this is so we can be easily protected at the cost of possibly giving up some civil liberties
friend: in fact...
friend: i would bet that this guys life has been totally and completely unaffected by the Patriot act
friend: he just wants an excuse to hate on bush
friend: or the GOP
--------we started talking about TV stuff then------
friend: but anyway...
friend: but yea the patriot act keeps us from terrorists and allows the gov to arrest and convict them easier so they dont get off the hook from a stupid technicality... Like Miranda in Miranda V. Arizona
he had to go, o'reilly factor was on lol
