gs's look 50 times better imo, mario do it.
or i have a dvc30, if your trying to buy a dope ass sd camera thats like a mini dvx.
ok tell me how having 3ccds is better than having an hd cmos. aside from colors and the SLIGHT rolling shutter you cant even see. and the whole good/bad fisheye option thing because thats just dumb, you can put any fisheye on if you really want to.
I'm not going to use the HD and 3ccd sd looks way better than sd with the hv.
uhg h/o
ok tell me how having 3ccds is better than having an hd cmos. aside from colors and the SLIGHT rolling shutter you cant even see.
-smaller filesize
-don't need to have a nice computer to edit
-colors is pretty much everything i'd look for in a cam. nobody's going to care if you have 3409584 lines of resolution when everything looks bland.
-cheaper
-DVDs
3CCD SD is perfect for my purposes, and until I get a legit setup to edit on theres no way I'd get HD.
bold is pretty much the same thing.
underlined, you can make the colors on any good cmos camera look like 3ccd colors if you white balance it right
- italic, gs500 cost more than a refurbished hv20
DVDs, ok so now its impossible to put footage shot in hd on a dvd?
Why would you put HD footage on DVD?
Have you ever seen people spending money on a hv to film in SD? No, wonder why.
Do you know anything about computers? Editing 1080 is going to require a better video card, ram and processor to process the footage. I can pop a 60gig clip on a time line with no problem on my editing pc, if I put a 1080p clip on there i can't even play back or render without waiting forever. Why do you think all of the new versions of editing programs require like minimum 4 gig RAM?bold is pretty much the same thing.
underlined, you can make the colors on any good cmos camera look like 3ccd colors if you white balance it right
- italic, gs500 cost more than a refurbished hv20
DVDs, ok so now its impossible to put footage shot in hd on a dvd?
but if they already have it, why not use it?
Why not sell it and get something that would make sense?
because you can use the hv30 and film in sd, and eventually when you get w/e you need you can film in hd without having to buy a new cam.
I'm not saying its better, but from a professional point of view, where money matters, SD DVD is the way to go. How many people have SD TVs and DVD players vs HDTVs and bluray players? I don't fuck around with youtube except for little shit. Its not professional. If I'm dropping money on equipment, I want to sell my product at top quality and I want to get the most sales possible form it. If you release something on DVD, EVERYONE can buy it, everyone has a DVD player. If you release to HD bluray audience only, your selling your shit to a fraction of people. Yeah a lot of people have HDTVs, but i doubt most of those people have blu ray players. If anything they have a upscaling DVD player, tv or receiver. Look at this chart compaing bluray vs DVD sales
See what I mean? Imagine the cost produce a bluray video... my setup would be HVX, lens, P2 cards, external drive, computer able to edit HD smoothly, bluray burner, bluray roms... fuck that prob like 10gs right there. I can purchase a whole SD rig for under $5,000.
category to compare SD vs HD, it doesn't work.
I admit, it was astupid move on my part to get an hv30 to film in HD to only capture it in sd on my computer. And now I realize I should have gotten a 3chip camera. I really want a gs500, they look really nice.
first troll to make me laugh.no sir
I'd like to get a gs500, I'll see if I can do that.