Political Discussion Thread

Tyler Wheeland. said:
Okay danny
all i wanna know is WHY obama lifted the ban or w/e and is letting OUR tax money go to other countrys getting aborations were you say were like some billion dollars in debt.
just wanna know
NOT create conflict.
just because we are in debt doesn't mean we stop spending. our country is in perpetual debt, if we are going to spend money it should at least go towards go causes.
 

seankane

Member
to quote a new york times article i'm reading right now:

"With the fuel economy measures and clean energy investments in the recovery package, President Obama has done more in one week to reduce oil dependence and global warming than George Bush did in eight years."

not related to anything, i just thought that was pretty cool.


and danny, if that's the case, why have retired military officials, who have spoken out against the war in iraq, continually said we need a stronger presence in afghanistan?
 

oconn7

Member
Danny Warwick said:
or at least formulate an entire new plan, nothing is or has gotten accomplished.
That is false. My friends brother just got back from his 2nd tour in iraq he told me so much has been accomplished. He told me that the country has changed for the better we saved thousands off lives by taking sadamm out we created democracy the Iraqi police force is able to handle themselves we defeated the islamic terroist and beat the Iraqi republican guard within 3 weeks there.

And back on the gun laws I still dont see why people think stricter background checks will make a difference? A majority of gun crimes are commited with criminals with unregistered guns and NO gun liscence they get it through black market. So stricter background checks wouldnt make a difference. I also think somebody shouldnt have to conceal their weapon.
 

Tylerr.

Super Moderator
Staff member
Danny Warwick said:
Tyler Wheeland. said:
Okay danny
all i wanna know is WHY obama lifted the ban or w/e and is letting OUR tax money go to other countrys getting aborations were you say were like some billion dollars in debt.
just wanna know
NOT create conflict.
just because we are in debt doesn't mean we stop spending. our country is in perpetual debt, if we are going to spend money it should at least go towards go causes.
okay
but why cant we just let other countrys deal with it
as in pay for their own aborations?
cause were appreantly so in debt
 

Hep Greg

Administrator
tanner markley said:
On the topic of christianity vs. homosexuals, I heard somewhere that there's been some evidence that homosexuality isn't a lifestyle choice, but rather occurs at birth, so I looked into it and found an article on it ( http://news.softpedia.com/news/Homosexual-by-Birth-41918.shtml ). If that's true, then that might make a big change in many christians' attitudes - homosexuals will then probably have to be considered in the same way as disabled people, and there will probably be some revisions made to the bible (the holy bible: the revised 21st century edition LOL, word of god right thurr eh), either that or all the creationists will argue to death that the evidence is false, etc, etc.

im not reading any of the other shitty posts
but i read a lot of articles like that and it deals with the sex hormones given to you in the womb are obviously different.
they did a test with twins, and found 50 percent or something like that if one was gay, so was the other.

theyve already proved that its before birth, the problem is they cant figure out where this gene is or if it is a gene or something to do with the mother.

and a lot of you obv wont know this but if one person in your family is gay chances are there are more then one.


[/quote]
k good so now we know their half retarted too

[/quote]

actually no youre the retard, you have no imput in this. gtfo
-margaret
 

Davon

Member
Dre said:
Imo, death penalty does help put an end to a good deal of crime (eg. china - they implemented the death penalty for relatively minor offenses such as pickpocketing, and the petty crime rate dropped significantly), but then again you have to look at all the cases where people are wrongfully convicted. Even if forensic technology keeps getting better, there still is going to be some degree of uncertainty in an investigation, so yeah, maybe extended sentences are a better option.

And to whoever said gay marriage should be made illegal, I want to know why. And if you try to give me any religious or homophobic bullshit I will just ignore you.
In response to your gay marriage part. Priest shouldn't be forced against their religion to marry same sex couples. If it's their faith. Also men could marry men and not even be gay. This could be a problem for insurance and healthcare
 

dre

Member
Davon said:
Dre said:
Imo, death penalty does help put an end to a good deal of crime (eg. china - they implemented the death penalty for relatively minor offenses such as pickpocketing, and the petty crime rate dropped significantly), but then again you have to look at all the cases where people are wrongfully convicted. Even if forensic technology keeps getting better, there still is going to be some degree of uncertainty in an investigation, so yeah, maybe extended sentences are a better option.

And to whoever said gay marriage should be made illegal, I want to know why. And if you try to give me any religious or homophobic bullshit I will just ignore you.
In response to your gay marriage part. Priest shouldn't be forced against their religion to marry same sex couples. If it's their faith. Also men could marry men and not even be gay. This could be a problem for insurance and healthcare
No, I meant that gay couples should be able to receive the same marriage benefits that straight married couples receive. You also don't have to be in a church to get legally married either.

And about the men marrying other men and not being gay part, I don't know of any self-respecting straight guy who would willingly get married to another dude, even if their relationship is completely platonic.
 

Mattt.C

I own WSP.
HummaScoots said:
I think the death penalty is fair.
Kill someone and you should be killed. it's only fair.

Dont people deserve second chances, and all those people in the army/secret servise kill for the country to protect other people for the greater good. And who has the right to give the deathpenalty to a killer they are just doing what the the killer did. I do see your point if someone was murdered you would like to have justice served to the killer, but not bye death thats just sadening his or her family bye putting the burden on two peoples familys now.
 

qwxor

I got myself banned.
dan i saw you post this on myspace and thought it was really interesting so im sharing with everyone on sr

soooooo fucked up
28k35lyjpg.png
 
Hep Greg said:
tanner markley said:
On the topic of christianity vs. homosexuals, I heard somewhere that there's been some evidence that homosexuality isn't a lifestyle choice, but rather occurs at birth, so I looked into it and found an article on it ( http://news.softpedia.com/news/Homosexual-by-Birth-41918.shtml ). If that's true, then that might make a big change in many christians' attitudes - homosexuals will then probably have to be considered in the same way as disabled people, and there will probably be some revisions made to the bible (the holy bible: the revised 21st century edition LOL, word of god right thurr eh), either that or all the creationists will argue to death that the evidence is false, etc, etc.

im not reading any of the other shitty posts
but i read a lot of articles like that and it deals with the sex hormones given to you in the womb are obviously different.
they did a test with twins, and found 50 percent or something like that if one was gay, so was the other.

theyve already proved that its before birth, the problem is they cant figure out where this gene is or if it is a gene or something to do with the mother.

and a lot of you obv wont know this but if one person in your family is gay chances are there are more then one.
k good so now we know their half retarted too

[/quote]

actually no youre the retard, you have no imput in this. gtfo
-margaret

[/quote]
you basically just told us that we should treat them the same way as we treat handicapped or retarted people so i will ill treat them as if they were retarted
 

me1

Member
Chris Bendel said:
dan i saw you post this on myspace and thought it was really interesting so im sharing with everyone on sr

soooooo fucked up
28k35lyjpg.png
Jail seems a lot better than living on the streets. Food and shelter is better than none, no matter how bad the food or shelter is. He probably begged for a longer sentence too.
 

Davon

Member
Dre said:
Davon said:
Dre said:
Imo, death penalty does help put an end to a good deal of crime (eg. china - they implemented the death penalty for relatively minor offenses such as pickpocketing, and the petty crime rate dropped significantly), but then again you have to look at all the cases where people are wrongfully convicted. Even if forensic technology keeps getting better, there still is going to be some degree of uncertainty in an investigation, so yeah, maybe extended sentences are a better option.

And to whoever said gay marriage should be made illegal, I want to know why. And if you try to give me any religious or homophobic bullshit I will just ignore you.
In response to your gay marriage part. Priest shouldn't be forced against their religion to marry same sex couples. If it's their faith. Also men could marry men and not even be gay. This could be a problem for insurance and healthcare
No, I meant that gay couples should be able to receive the same marriage benefits that straight married couples receive. You also don't have to be in a church to get legally married either.

And about the men marrying other men and not being gay part, I don't know of any self-respecting straight guy who would willingly get married to another dude, even if their relationship is completely platonic.
In California gay couples were already allowed the same marriage benefits. They were just b-itching over prop 8 because it wasn't called "marriage"
 

Jordan Jasa

Silver Member
liltony said:
R-man said:
Obama should have lost we need a republican in office
lol remember what happened last time? and when mccain dies then pailin would be... i dont even want to think about it
hmm remember what our whole legislative branch is? democrats. remember when the economy started going down the drain? when they took over.

and McCain would not die in office. hes a rich politician, he can afford the best health care in the world.

but i agree, we would have been screwed if palin was prez haha.
 
Top