Aaron Huff
Member
R.o.b said:WAIT. Since the fork doesn't even go into the bars anymore, won't that make the bars more prone to snapping right above the clamp?
You wont need slits in your bars anymore so no not really.
R.o.b said:WAIT. Since the fork doesn't even go into the bars anymore, won't that make the bars more prone to snapping right above the clamp?
Since your bars no longer need slits at the bottom (and you have to cut the bottom 2 inches off your bars anyways) you can easily shorten your bars by making one cut, plugging them in the clamp and going. No more notching. If you have a starnut setter you can probably get a starnut in some .120 but I would not even try with a hammer and socket or just go to a bike shop.kolby crouch said:wow andrew im sorry for doubting you man, can you explain how to use bigger bars and how to adjust height for me a little more, i still dont quite understand those, oh and does the bmx starnut fit into .120 wall forktubes? i will purchase this when i get the money man, im already selling my fork right now though because bars come first
Billet aluminum, anodizing, laser engraving, star nuts, compression cap, hardware? This stuff didn't just grow on trees you know, besides the price is not final until it is posted in the store.Joe Riley. said:extremely smart, but why does it cost $65?
Putting it in forks is a LOT easier. You only have to pound it in a quarter as deep as with the inverted. Plus 1-1/8" star nuts are cheap and easy to find if you mess up unlike 1-1/4" which people use in bars for the inverted. Once more people start riding these and the trend catches on I will start selling my forks with threaded inserts then starnuts will be history. I'm just slowly phasing out the old technology with the new... if I released everything I wanted to, how I want to, all at once then people would overload and parts would not be compatible and it would just make it far too complicated and expensive for people to invest in this stuff because they would have to by everything at once instead of being able to buy it piece by piece like I am making it possible to do now.Matt Reeves said:Isn't the part that most people hate about inverted compression the starnut? Because you still have to put it in
R.o.b said:WAIT. Since the fork doesn't even go into the bars anymore, won't that make the bars more prone to snapping right above the clamp?
I just want both of you to take a moment and really think about what you are saying... I'm shocked and baffled that anyone would even suggest this:Joe Riley. said:it seems clever, but not very strong. nothing inside the bars, so couldnt they snap easier? wouldnt it snap easily above the clamp? you would need thicker bars.
Cory VanLew said:I'm pretty sure a triangle structure is the strongest thing on the planet... So just make everything triangular ;] just kidding. It looks good tho i think i'll invest in one until Inward comes out with something similar.
I'm sure one could argue that is a matter of opinion... but I still appreciate it, a lot.AaronBransdon. said:Was he not the first to make the best aftermarket forks, bars and wheels?
That being said, i'm sure he can be the best at aftermarket compression systems too, right?
I cant wait.the_SD_local said:I'm sure one could argue that is a matter of opinion... but I still appreciate it, a lot.AaronBransdon. said:Was he not the first to make the best aftermarket forks, bars and wheels?
That being said, i'm sure he can be the best at aftermarket compression systems too, right?
Seriously.
Wait til you see the decks...